ExplainerGPU and neocloud pricing

What posted GPU cloud prices tell you, and what they do not

A posted GPU price is a listing for one configuration, term and moment. Comparing two of them takes seven adjustments, and none turns a listing into a transaction.

Cover of the full report: What posted GPU cloud prices tell you, and what they do not
The research behind this article, with every source listed. 17 pages.

Key points

From the Summary of the full report

  1. One machine, many posted prices. On 9 October 2026, AWS's on-demand, reservation, Savings Plans and Spot prices for the same 8-GPU H100 instance in one region ranged from $2.59 to $6.88 per GPU-hour, depending on pricing type, term and payment [3][4][5][6]. Spot prices for that instance differed by up to 28% across Availability Zones in the same region on the same day [5].
  2. Posted prices change by decision. AWS cut P5 on-demand prices by 44% in June 2025 [7], raised Capacity Block prices by about 15% in January 2026 and about 20% in July 2026 [8][9], and describes Capacity Block prices as updated with supply and demand [3].
  3. Availability flags are thin signals. Provider APIs report where an instance type can be launched, or how likely a Spot request is to succeed, without guarantees or quantities [10][11][12][13].

GPU cloud prices are easy to find. Hyperscalers publish price lists and pricing APIs, neoclouds publish rate cards, and index publishers turn them into daily series. In 2026, exchanges proposed futures that settle on such series [24][26].

Each of these uses assumes a posted price measures something stable. It does, but the thing it measures is narrow: what one configuration costs, under one set of terms, at one moment, if capacity is there. This explainer shows what that means in practice.

One machine, many prices

Take one instance with fixed hardware: AWS's p5.48xlarge, with 8 NVIDIA H100 GPUs [6]. On 9 October 2026, AWS posted these prices for it in US East (N. Virginia), among others [3][4][5].

Pricing type Term and payment Per GPU-hour
On-Demand None $6.88
Capacity Block Reserved block for a future date, paid upfront $5.970
Compute Savings Plan 1 year, no upfront $5.42
EC2 Instance Savings Plan 1 year, no upfront $4.33
EC2 Instance Savings Plan 3 years, all upfront $2.59
Spot Interruptible $3.61 to $4.64 by Availability Zone

Same chips, same region, same day. The on-demand rate is about 2.7 times the three-year rate. Spot prices differed by up to 28% between Availability Zones in the same region [5].

Each row answers a different question. On-demand is capacity with no commitment at a static hourly rate [1]. A Capacity Block reserves instances for a future date, cannot be cancelled and is paid whether or not it is used [2][3]. A Savings Plan commits to a stated amount of compute use, measured per hour, for one or three years [4]. Spot is spare capacity the provider can reclaim with two minutes' notice at AWS [1] and 30 seconds at Azure [11]. Google says its Spot prices can change up to once a day [10].

Posted prices move by decision

Posted prices change when the provider decides to change them. AWS cut H100 on-demand prices by 44% in June 2025 [7]. It raised Capacity Block prices by about 15% in January 2026 and about 20% in July 2026 [8][9]. In January an AWS spokesperson said its commitment not to raise On-Demand and Savings Plans prices was unchanged [8].

So two series built from the same provider can diverge: one from on-demand rates, one from reservations. One index publisher found its hyperscaler H100 on-demand index unchanged on 39 of 50 daily transitions between 1 March and 20 April 2026, and described it as a price ceiling posted above reserved capacity [14].

Availability flags are thin

Providers report availability, but in limited forms. Lambda's API lists "the regions in which this instance type is available" next to the price [12]. AWS's Spot placement score estimates how likely a Spot request is to succeed and "does not provide any guarantees" [13]. Azure shows hourly eviction rates from the past seven days [11]. None reports how many GPUs can be launched, for how long, or at what cluster size. A price without availability may describe capacity no one can buy at that moment.

A listing is not a transaction

A posted price is a listing: what the seller asks anyone for that configuration, at that time. Large contracts are priced privately. Nebius reported contracts at $20 million to $25 million of annual value per megawatt [20], a unit that never appears on a rate card. Nscale describes take-or-pay agreements with fixed pricing over the term [21].

Regulators have noticed the gap. The CFTC's 2026 request for comment on compute derivatives asks what proportion of compute transactions occur at publicly disclosed prices, and whether a contract should settle to a price computed from data the Commission may not be able to observe or verify [28]. It also asks what would stop a provider from moving a settlement index by adjusting a posted rate [28]. Index designs answer differently: ICE and Ornn describe Ornn's index as built only from printed transactions [26], while CME's proposed contracts reference Silicon Data indexes of on-demand rental rates [24][27].

Seven ways a comparison goes wrong

Before two posted prices can be compared, each of these has to match.

  1. GPU variant. An H100 SXM has 80 GB of memory and 900 GB/s NVLink. An H100 NVL has 94 GB and 600 GB/s [19]. Both are "H100."
  2. Interconnect. AWS posts a 1-GPU p5.4xlarge and the 8-GPU p5.48xlarge at the same $6.88 per GPU-hour [5]. Per GPU, the larger node has four times the network bandwidth plus the NVSwitch fabric [6].
  3. Node size. NVIDIA lists H100 SXM systems with 4 or 8 GPUs [19]. A single-GPU offer serves different work.
  4. Region. The same p5.48xlarge costs $8.944 per GPU-hour on demand in London and $6.88 in Virginia [5].
  5. Term and payment. Commitment alone moved the price 2.7-fold in the table above.
  6. Bundled CPU, memory and storage. The p5.48xlarge includes 192 vCPUs, 2 TiB of memory and about 30 TB of local NVMe [6]. A bare GPU listing is a smaller product.
  7. Billing rules. Upfront reservation fees, cancellation terms, operating system fees and interruption notice change the effective cost of equal hourly prices [1][2][3].

Index construction adds an eighth trap. One publisher's daily hyperscaler on-demand H100 index sat near $7.46 in May 2026 [15], while its quarterly median series put hyperscaler H100 medians at $4.80 to $6.10 for the third quarter through July [16]. Both are honest. They are built differently.

How the Rillor Compute Index methodology treats posted prices

The Rillor Compute Index methodology v1.0, published on 9 October 2026, handles each of these points [25]. A rental price published through a pricing API or page is a listing, and every observation carries its evidence class, so a listing never counts as a sale. Each observation records its source and capture time. Availability is recorded as the provider reports it. On-demand, spot and reserved prices stay separate, with reserved terms recorded in months, and hyperscaler and neocloud segments are shown separately. Prices are normalized per GPU-hour and mapped to GPU class and variant, interconnect, node size, region, term and pricing type. Each series takes a median for each provider, then the median across providers, so a provider with many listings counts once. Rillor's own quotes and agreements are excluded, and a series is published only when it meets the methodology's data rules. The series are for research and planning use and are not offered for settlement of any contract.

Read the full report

The full report, with the complete price tables, the normalization checklist, the method, its limits and 28 numbered sources, is available as a PDF.

The full report

What posted GPU cloud prices tell you, and what they do not

The research behind this article, with every source listed. 17 pages.

  1. Summary
  2. Background
  3. Data and method
  4. Findings
  5. Implications
  6. Limits of this analysis
  7. Sources

Sources

  1. Spot Instances, Amazon EC2 User Guide. Amazon Web Services, accessed 9 October 2026. https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSEC2/latest/UserGuide/using-spot-instances.html
  2. Capacity Blocks for ML, Amazon EC2 User Guide. Amazon Web Services, accessed 9 October 2026. https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSEC2/latest/UserGuide/ec2-capacity-blocks.html
  3. Amazon EC2 Capacity Blocks for ML pricing. Amazon Web Services, accessed 9 October 2026. https://aws.amazon.com/ec2/capacityblocks/pricing/
  4. What are Savings Plans?, Savings Plans User Guide. Amazon Web Services, accessed 9 October 2026. https://docs.aws.amazon.com/savingsplans/latest/userguide/what-is-savings-plans.html
  5. AWS Price List Query API (GetProducts, AmazonEC2), Savings Plans API (DescribeSavingsPlansOfferingRates) and Amazon EC2 API (DescribeSpotPriceHistory), queried for p5.48xlarge and related instance types. Amazon Web Services, retrieved 9 October 2026. https://docs.aws.amazon.com/aws-cost-management/latest/APIReference/API_pricing_GetProducts.html ; https://docs.aws.amazon.com/savingsplans/latest/APIReference/API_DescribeSavingsPlansOfferingRates.html ; https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSEC2/latest/APIReference/API_DescribeSpotPriceHistory.html
  6. Amazon EC2 P5 Instances. Amazon Web Services, accessed 9 October 2026. https://aws.amazon.com/ec2/instance-types/p5/
  7. Channy Yun, Announcing up to 45% price reduction for Amazon EC2 NVIDIA GPU-accelerated instances. AWS News Blog, 5 June 2025. https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/aws/announcing-up-to-45-price-reduction-for-amazon-ec2-nvidia-gpu-accelerated-instances/
  8. Emma Woollacott, AWS just quietly increased EC2 Capacity Block prices. ITPro, 6 January 2026. https://www.itpro.com/cloud/cloud-computing/aws-amazon-ec2-capacity-blocks-price-increase
  9. Michael Fisher, AWS Raises GPU Capacity Block Prices 20% for AI Workloads. Tradingpedia, 26 June 2026. https://www.tradingpedia.com/2026/06/26/aws-raises-gpu-capacity-block-prices-20-for-ai-workloads/
  10. Spot VMs, Compute Engine documentation. Google Cloud, accessed 9 October 2026. https://docs.cloud.google.com/compute/docs/instances/spot
  11. About Azure Spot Virtual Machines. Microsoft Learn, updated 24 June 2026. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/virtual-machines/spot-vms
  12. Lambda Cloud API reference, List available instance types. Lambda, accessed 9 October 2026. https://docs.lambda.ai/api/cloud
  13. Spot placement score, Amazon EC2 User Guide. Amazon Web Services, accessed 9 October 2026. https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSEC2/latest/UserGuide/spot-placement-score.html
  14. Carmen Li, H100 Hyperscaler Index, April 2026: A Benchmark in Flat Mode. Silicon Data, 27 April 2026. https://www.silicondata.com/blog/h100-hyperscaler-index-april-2026
  15. Carmen Li, H100 Index, May 2026: Same Chip, Two Tiers, Two Regimes. Silicon Data, 16 June 2026. https://www.silicondata.com/blog/h100-index-may-2026-two-tiers-two-regimes
  16. Yang Gao, H100 Rental Prices by Region (Q3 2026): The Hyperscaler Premium Has Halved. Silicon Data, 31 July 2026. https://www.silicondata.com/blog/h100-rental-prices-by-region-q3-2026
  17. NVIDIA H100 Tensor Core GPU, specifications. NVIDIA Corporation, accessed 9 October 2026. https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/data-center/h100/
  18. Nebius Group Letter to Shareholders, Q2 2026 (Exhibit 99.2 to Form 6-K). Nebius Group N.V., 12 August 2026. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1513845/000110465926094568/tm2622968d1_ex99-2.htm
  19. Nscale Ltd, Registration Statement on Form S-1. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission EDGAR, 18 September 2026. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/0002110365/000119312526395475/ck0002110365-20260918.htm
  20. CME Group and Silicon Data to Launch Compute Futures on October 5 to Unlock New Way to Hedge AI Risks. CME Group and Silicon Data (PR Newswire), 11 August 2026, text as reproduced by StockTitan. https://www.stocktitan.net/news/CME/cme-group-and-silicon-data-to-launch-compute-futures-on-october-5-to-wgqge1aqpsum.html
  21. Rillor Compute Index, Methodology v1.0. Rillor Corporation, 9 October 2026. https://rillor.com/markets/compute-index
  22. ICE and Ornn to Launch GPU Compute Futures Contracts. Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (Business Wire), 19 May 2026. https://s2.q4cdn.com/154085107/files/doc_news/ICE-and-Ornn-to-Launch-GPU-Compute-Futures-Contracts-2026.pdf
  23. CME Group and Silicon Data Partner to Launch First Compute Futures. CME Group and Silicon Data (PR Newswire), 12 May 2026, text as reproduced by StockTitan. https://www.stocktitan.net/news/CME/cme-group-and-silicon-data-partner-to-launch-first-compute-xsea0cl8o8z2.html
  24. Request for Comment on the Listing of Compute Derivatives Contracts, 91 FR 54259. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (Federal Register), 21 August 2026. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2026-08-21/pdf/2026-17163.pdf

Notices

Rillor is not a registered investment adviser or commodity trading advisor and does not provide investment or trading advice. Research, forecasts, data and software described on this site are for research and engineering use. Nothing here is an offer or recommendation to buy or sell any security, commodity interest or digital asset. Past or simulated results do not indicate future results.

Rillor Compute Index series are for research and planning use. They are not offered for settlement of any contract.

NVIDIA, AMD, Ceph, Kubernetes and related product names are trademarks of their owners and are used only to identify products. No affiliation or endorsement is implied.

Tell us which GPU classes you track.

Send the GPU classes, regions and pricing types you need, and how often you need them.

Request pricing data