Dataset 01Last reviewed

Legal Authority Corpus

Selected legal and administrative authority materials organized as structured, reviewable records.

Start a conversation

Request accessDiscuss custom coverage

Prefills dataset

legal-authority

  • Contents

    Authority documents, source metadata, citation identity, document structure, and relationships

  • Geography / period

    Selected Brazilian administrative authority material, declared per source

  • Evidence classes

    4 classes, kept structurally separate

Evidence classes

A published document and a normalized field are not the same kind of fact. This dataset keeps each in its own class so a derived value never reads as something the source itself asserted.

ClassWhat the record assertsPresent today
published authority materialA document as published by the originating authority, retained with its capture contextin review
source metadataWhere a document was retrieved from and when, so a normalized record can be traced backin review
authority identityThe resolved identity of the issuing body and the citation a record is filed underin review
document structureThe declared internal structure of a document — its sections, headings, and orderingin review

Originating courts, tribunals, agencies, and publishers remain authoritative; a normalized record is not a substitute for checking the source.

Representative enterprise uses

  • Source-linked legal research

  • Authority retrieval and comparison

  • Citation and relationship analysis

  • Evidence-grounded legal applications

Intended users

  • Legal research teams
  • Knowledge, dataset, and application builders
  • Developers of evidence-grounded legal workflows

Scope

Selected Brazilian administrative authority materials used in the development of Grellum, structured as reviewable records with their source metadata.

Sources, structure, quality, and delivery

Sources, rights, and provenance

Source categories

  • Selected publicly accessible Brazilian administrative authority materials
  • Source metadata and retrieval records needed to trace a normalized record to its origin

Rights posture

Provenance and applicable usage terms are recorded by source category before broader access is considered. Originating authorities remain authoritative.

Structure, labels, and lineage

Entity resolution and normalization

The dataset separates source capture from normalized identity, citation, document structure, and relationship fields so revisions can be reviewed without erasing source history.

Lineage

Each governed record is designed to retain its source reference, capture context, transformation history, and applicable dataset version.

Quality, reconciliation, and versioning

Quality and reconciliation

Quality work covers schema, citation identity, document integrity, and reconciliation checks.

Freshness and versioning

Refresh objectives are set per collection. No production freshness commitment is offered.

Delivery and access discussion

Access state

There is no public download, API, feed, or service-level commitment.

Delivery discussion

An authenticated API, a scheduled export, or an agreed structured format can be scoped for this dataset. Coverage, schema, authentication, cadence, versions, rights, and support are defined with the engagement.

Use and attribution

Notes for working with this record and attributing its contents.

  • This dataset is not a substitute for checking material with the originating court, tribunal, agency, or publisher.
  • Inclusion does not imply endorsement by, or affiliation with, any public authority.
  • Records must be verified against their cited origins before consequential use.
  • Cite the originating source when a record is reused or republished.
  • Coverage follows the reviewed source set for each dataset.
  • Rillor is not an official market, exchange, or vendor source.
  • Access, delivery, and support terms are agreed per engagement.
  • Recording a rights posture is not the same as holding commercial redistribution rights for every source; permitted use is confirmed during qualification.
  • Conflicting observations are reconciled with the decision retained rather than overwritten, and no accuracy, fill-rate, or match-rate figure is published until it is regenerated and reviewed.